Africa

Two high school sisters in the Boston area have helped begin a program to bring sturdy, inexpensive laptop computers to underprivileged students in South Africa.  What is most remarkable is the way that this small idea is already beginning to grow and how two people have been able to make a difference. Some might argue that perhaps laptop computers ought not to be a priority when dealing with issues of poverty, but it seems that education is a vital variable when looking at how to address economic inequality and lack of opportunity.  Laptops may not be the most important thing these kids in Kliptown need, but surely they deserve access to an increasingly technology-driven, wired world if they hope to break the cycles of poverty.

From a Medical Research Council report on children’s health issues in South Africa:

Every year almost 23,000 South African babies die in their first month of life, yet one in five of these deaths could be avoided with better education, and relatively inexpensive and easily implemented changes in healthcare, says a new study by the Medical Research Council (MRC).

“The bad news is that, according to the report, ‘one in five deaths could have been clearly avoided’, and inequalities are also highlighted, with avoidable deaths being twice as common in rural areas,” said Joy Lawn, Senior Policy and Research Advisor at Saving Newborn Lives, a programme run by Save the Children, an international non-governmental organisation for children’s rights, in the foreword to the report.

“The good news is that these deaths are not complex or expensive to prevent - improving the quality of care during childbirth is a top priority that would also save mothers’ lives and reduce long-term disabilities in children,” Lawn commented. 

This latter news, of course, is what South Africans must work to bring to fruition. These issues are tied in with questions of opportunity and access that South Africa also struggles to address.

Privation connected to poverty and vulnerability to climate change is wreaking havoc throughout the continent. Lesotho continues to suffer from drought-fueled food shortages. The droughts have also affected Swaziland and South Africa. The economic crisis in Swaziland has led to increased sex trafficking among children as well as women. Informal settlements in Namibia are embody hell on earth. Climate change is leading to an increase in malaria cases in Kenya.

 The news of the increased UN-African Union peacekeeping presence has raised hopes of humanitarian relief for the people of Darfur. Sudan claims that it will support the troop presence. We;ll see how long Khartoum’s conciliatory attitude lasts. Some Sudanese, meanwhile, are looking to South Africa for a blueprint for peace.

At Foreign Policy Stephan Faris worries that the boomlet that parts of Africa appear to be enjoying might be chimerical, with oil fueling another manifestation of the resource curse. The Council for Foreign Relations explores the process of ”hunting for elusive peace.” Despite these real concerns, there also is real progress on parts of the continent, as Kofi Annan argues in the Mail & Guardian.

At The New Republic Eliza Griswold analyzes the Somalia crisis as “the other failed invasion,” which is problematic inasmuch as viewing Africa through the prism of Iraq manages to be both too Western-centric while at the same time allowing Iraq to disproportionately warp our views of other issues.

In order to address the mindboggling inflation rate in Zimbabwe (is it really possible that it could reach 100,000% by the end of the year?) the government has issued  a Z$200,000 note worth $1 US. Meanwhile, add water shortages to the daily sufferings of the people of Zim.  

The International AIDS Society (IAS) conference, the biggest of its kind in the world, just closed in Australia. Its most significant conclusion is that the world must find a way to develop and deliver child-specific, side-effect-free (or limited) drugs to allow children with the disease to survive into adulthood (and perhaps to live to see a future in which the disease is eradicated).

Beyond hoary “children are the future” cliches, this proposal makes sense for a number of reasons. For one, call me a cynic, but the cliche is a great selling point. Finding a way to address in AIDS in children will inevitably capture hearts and imaginations in a way that simply addressing AIDS in Africa does not. But beyond the salesmanship, it seems logical to try to stanch the spread of a disease that has proven so fatal for children. Address the disease among its youngest victims while at the same time pushing for antiretroviral drugs geared toward adults and with side effects that can prove as dangerous to children as the disease they intend to attack. This is a strategy that seems both smart from a disease-combating perspective as well as from a marketing and political vantage point.