Mauritania’s Bloodless Coup
The potentially bad news is that there has been a coup in Mauritania. In the country’s capital, Nouakchott, General Mohammad al-Abdul Aziz, the head of the presidential guard, and General Mohammad al-Ghazwani, the army chief-of-staff, both of whom had recently been fired have taken control of the presidential palace. Officers seized President Sidi Mohamed Ould Cheikh Abdallahi on Wednesday, along with the country’s interior minister and prime minister. Such machinations are nothing new in Mauritania, as the country has seen at least ten coups of coup attempts since 1960.
The potentially good news is that this appears to be a bloodless coup (as was the one in 2005). Even more promising, the military leaders have promised that the country will hold free and transparent democratic elections “as soon as possible.” In the interim, the country will be governed by a council of eleven leaders largely drawn from the military leadership.
On balance, however, the transition of political power by coup is disquieting. The United States, European Union, and African union all condemned the coup. That Mauritania, an exceedingly poor nation, recently discovered small reserves of oil only makes the country’s political situation all the more tenuous. One hopes the promised election materialize, but what is even more necessary for Mauritania’s future success as a nation state is a transformation within the political culture in which coups do not become the de facto default position among those who desire power or change.
August 7th, 2008 at 9:52 pm
Pres. Abdellahi did not seize power in a coup. The Aug. 2005 coup deposed gen. Mouauia ould el-Tayaa, the dictator since 21 years, and Abdellahi was elected almost two years later, in a narrow vote which was only slightly fishy. It was deemed free and fair by observers and opposed by no country, and defeat was immediately accepted by the runner-up. No one claimed cheating.
Like most Mauritanian politicians, Abdellahi is moderatly interested in democracy and more or less corrupt, but he was not — not yet, at least — a dictator or someone who rode into Nouakchott on a tank. Rather he was the country’s first freely and fairly elected president ever, and that makes your enthusiasm for the junta’s promise of future elections misplaced. They’ve already HAD elections, and Abdellahi was the guy who won. This coup promises new elections as a way of undoing that.
August 8th, 2008 at 10:07 am
Thanks for the insight. I have clarified my post, though I think the larger point about the disquieting nature of coups in general stands. Indeed your comments probably bolster my point.
Thanks for reading and weighing in –
Derek Catsam